Printable View
Both lines are connected to a 2-line cordless base station with a bunch of handsets (which are all 2-line capable) so all phones see and store both CID entries.Quote:
Originally Posted by burris
I realize the current behavior works well for some people but it doesn't work well for me. An option in vpanel would be in order. Maybe a hunt group rather than simultaneous ring would be the way to do it.
I know you have a problem with this, but whether you have single line phones, as I have, or 2-line phones, as you have, so long as both lines on the clone feature are active and online, and without some major re-engineering, I don't see how it could work any differently than it does now.Quote:
Originally Posted by sommerfeld
My Unidens do the same thing. Since it is technically a second line, it shows the CID from line 1 and line 2, hence the two copies.Quote:
Originally Posted by burris
My four line phone does the same thing. However, it identifies the lines - so I see line 1 - caller id, and line 2 - caller id (same caller id in both cases) along with the time stamp of each call. Since the call came in on both lines, I've always considered this the reasonable thing to do (besides the fact that in other rooms only one of the lines may have a phone attached).Quote:
Originally Posted by ptrowski
I have the same problem as Sommerfeld. I have a Siemens 2-line cordless system with a base station and several handsets. The problem is that the space on the handset display is simply not large enough to hold both name and number for two lines when they are ringing simultaneously. As a consequence, I get very little useful CID information from either line, particularly where the call comes in without a unique name field.
For example, a call coming in on line 1 only might normally display as:
Cell Phone California
510-123-4567
With both lines active, the call displays as:
Cell Phone California
Cell Phone California
The number is properly recorded in the phone's CID log. The problem is just with the display.
I understand that this may be difficult to fix from VOIPo's end. I'm wondering whether anyone can suggest a workaround. For example, if I set up the Contacts list, would the name field display with the name I used in that list? That would at least give me information for some of the calls. Any other ideas would be appreciated.
I sympathize with you for having a "buggy" product :-). Perhaps the solution is for VOIPo to have an option not to ring both lines at the same time - iirc, my former provider had that option.
Yes, if you have custom caller id, that should show up for the name - should be simple for you to test. Create one for your cell phone number and then call your voipo number.
Or perhaps an option not to ring both lines at the same time IF the calling number is the same. I just realized that my phone system also has a directory feature that stores and displays custom names.Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell
It's mostly a problem with cell phones, since they often do not include names. Unfortunately, everyone seems to be moving to cell phones these days. :(
Wouldn't the calling number always be the same ... I'm confused. I see the smiley - so I guess you want an option never to ring both lines. Correct?Quote:
Originally Posted by caseydoug
Can you ask voipo to provision your 2nd line with CID disabled? (Set CID Serv to "NO")
No, I was thinking about a call coming in on line 2 while line 1 is in use. I do want to ring both lines, because that's the whole point of having a cloned line. If I am on line 1 and get a second (different) call, I would like to see the CID information, even if it is just name with no number.Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell
Edit: I do wish there were an easier way to populate the Contacts list, e.g., add from call logs, import from csv, etc. I don't relish adding all those names and numbers manually.