That's a good question, IMO. Any tax that's based on a percentage amount would change if the price paid per month changes, so a simple refund of "(# months unused) x rate" might not apply. Therefore, it's conceivable that tax owed could eat into a service refund, but if voipo will not do any kind of balance billing (as in the cancel after 8 months example above), there will never be a situation wherein the customer OR voipo will owe a tax balance at the end of the day.
I'm not a tax lawyer, but I would think voipo would HAVE to figure the taxes into the refund, if they want to remain compliant with tax laws...
Bookmarks