Results 1 to 10 of 151

Thread: Upcoming Features/Enhancements

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Irvine CA
    Posts
    1,542,128,043

    Default Re: Upcoming Features/Enhancements

    Quote Originally Posted by sommerfeld View Post
    I have comcast business internet service with multiple static addresses. the voipo adapter has one of the static addresses. the router's firewall is disabled for all static addresses. this has been working since I installed the service several months ago and just started failing yesterday.

    the router configuration is already all the way open; there are no additional packet filtering or firewall settings to disable.
    Is it one of the SMC ones? If so, we've seen issues in the past with those where it was doing NAT behind the scenes and basically still proxying the traffic sent to the public IP. What model do you have
    Last edited by VOIPoTim; 08-21-2009 at 12:33 PM.
    Timothy Dick
    Founder/CEO
    VOIPo.com

    Interact with VOIPo: Twitter, Facebook

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    22

    Default Re: Upcoming Features/Enhancements

    Quote Originally Posted by VOIPoTim View Post
    Is it one of the SMC ones? If so, we've seen issues in the past with those where it was doing NAT behind the scenes and basically still proxying the traffic sent to the public IP. What model do you have
    SMC model 8014, running firmware version 4.01.20-CCR

    from a quick look at TCP traffic from another static ip I don't see sequence numbers or ip identifiers being rewritten -- it's not actually doing anything to the traffic it's allowing through.

    followup: it appears that the "internet folk wisdom" on the smc 8014 is to check the "disable smart packet detection" box, which is unchecked by default. I have not been able to find a description of what this option actually does (there's a one-sentence description in a manual I found on dslreports), but there seems to be a unanimous belief that SMC's "smart packet detection" is a bad idea.

    followup 2: this may have helped but the problem isn't completely gone -- had another silent call after disabling the feature.
    Last edited by sommerfeld; 08-21-2009 at 04:18 PM. Reason: followup - disable smart packet detection

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Irvine CA
    Posts
    1,542,128,043

    Default Re: Upcoming Features/Enhancements

    Quote Originally Posted by sommerfeld View Post
    SMC model 8014, running firmware version 4.01.20-CCR

    from a quick look at TCP traffic from another static ip I don't see sequence numbers or ip identifiers being rewritten -- it's not actually doing anything to the traffic it's allowing through.

    followup: it appears that the "internet folk wisdom" on the smc 8014 is to check the "disable smart packet detection" box, which is unchecked by default. I have not been able to find a description of what this option actually does (there's a one-sentence description in a manual I found on dslreports), but there seems to be a unanimous belief that SMC's "smart packet detection" is a bad idea.
    That could very well be it then. I know it sounds crazy but almost all new routers still filter packets behind the scenes even in DMZ or with only public IPs.
    Timothy Dick
    Founder/CEO
    VOIPo.com

    Interact with VOIPo: Twitter, Facebook

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Kitsap County, WA.
    Posts
    734

    Default Re: Upcoming Features/Enhancements

    Seems the soho industry is going towards the idea that end user needs a box to do it for them and away from true bridges. I looked for quite a while for a dsl modem for the office that didn't act as a router (was just a bridge).

    Those "cable gateways" are such a pain...
    I Void Warranties.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •